A blog by Patrick Crozier

October 20, 2004

UK Rock Hall of Fame - Channel Four
Patrick Crozier

About 20 years after the Americans led the way we've finally got round to setting up one of our own and over the next few weeks the founder members will be decided by you the public. Well, some founder members coz they've already got five:

The Beatles
Bob Marley

Not a good start. Elvis and the Beatles fine. But Madonna!? U2!? Come off it. Bob Marley? Well, I suppose there is a case. But Marley before Berry Gordy? I don't think so. But in a sense you can see the logic. They've decided to admit one artist from each decade. So one from the 50s, 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. Only one problem: the inescapable truth is that rock peaked in the 1960s and it's been downhill ever since. They would have been a lot better off admitting it. But instead they've lumbered themselves with an 80s shortlist that includes Guns 'n' Roses. And a 90s shortlist... you don't want to know about the 90s shortlist.

Anyway, as I hinted at, every week they take one decade and this week we're up to the 70s (it's in reverse order, see?) so I thought I'd indulge in some little idle speculation on who's going to make the shortlist.

My test for greatness is three great tracks. Any artist who managed three great tracks, at any time, is great. No questions asked. You might like to try the exercise with your own favourite band. Have they produced three great tracks? I tried the exercise with the Smiths and Joy Division (my personal faves) and I have to say I found myself struggling. Got there in the end, though. But it does go to show how great the Beatles, Abba and Elton John - with figures way above this - really are.

Anyway, these are who I think should be on the 70s list:

Elton John
Sex Pistols
Bob Dylan (he got better)
David Bowie
Led Zeppelin

With Rod Stewart (Maggie May and I don't want to talk about it) and Roxy Music on standby. Perhaps ELO too.

Yes, I know the Sex Pistols only produced two great tracks but at a stretch you can add Public Image to Anarchy and Vacant and, anyway, they were much more than just another rock group.

October 13, 2004

Weird and wonderful optical illusion
Patrick Crozier

…just here. Via Dave Barry.

October 12, 2004

That spiked Steyn article
Patrick Crozier

Oh, you didn't know Mark Steyn had an article pulled from the Telegraph? Well, he did and it's here. It's about the murder of Ken Bigley. And it's about mawkishness and Dianaism. And it gets close to hitting the nail on the head, though like Anthony Daniels earlier this week, not quite close enough.

October 11, 2004

Let's all play…
Patrick Crozier

…Moonbat Bingo. Here's the current leader:

"Busted are my favourite band. Previously, I was considering voting for the Lib Dems, but now I will vote Tory. They've really changed my mind."

Can you beat that?

October 10, 2004

The secrets of socialist seduction
Patrick Crozier

Peter Briffa reveals all:

Only the other night me and the wife went into a smoked-filled room, and, after several hours of meaningful dialogue, sustained by copious amounts of beer and sandwiches we returned with a composite resolution that, by a show of hands, was put to the floor and passed unanimously.

From birds and bees to beer and butties.

Saddam “didn’t understand international relations perfectly”
Patrick Crozier

…you can say that again. Hilarious (if you forget the torture, human experimentation, mass murder etc) Times account of the last days of Iraqi Ba'athism. Watch out for Saddam's Catch 22: if he admits he has WMD he gets clobbered by the Americans; if he denies it he gets clobbered by the Iranians

Our reaction to Mr Bigley's death is immature, dishonest and decadent
Patrick Crozier

Anthony Daniel's criticises the one-minute silences, the flower laying, the expressions of grief:

The sentimentalisation of public life has been enthusiastically embraced, one might almost say hugged, by New Labour. There could be no more devoted empathiser than Tony Blair, who personally feels the pain of every one of 500 million Africans.

...as he says. But...but...I am uneasy. Not about the general thrust of Daniels's argument - I, too, find this sort of thing deeply distasteful - but more that I don't he has got close to why it is such a bad thing.

October 01, 2004

Michael Moore promotes freedom…
Patrick Crozier

…in Iran. My Left Wing Girlfriend notes:

Interesting post from Daimnation! titled Unintended Consequences regarding Iran and Fahrenheit 9/11. A past example being a Soviet propaganda film which showed the misery and violence of America, however, audiences noticed that even the poorest Americans had their own cars, apartments, television sets, and based on their size, had too much to eat.

A similar thing is happening in Iran…

…"It sure is a great country, where someone like Moore trashes the president and gets away with it -- and makes so much money!"

Fnarr, fnarr.